Accomplishments

On March 7, 2025, Anthony Marino obtained a unanimous defense verdict after a three week trial in Supreme Court, Queens County before the Honorable Timothy J. Dufficy.  It was alleged by the Estate of the plaintiff’s decedent that the defendant Radiologist misinterpreted a pancreas sonogram which purportedly showed an enlarged pancreatic tail.  Ten months after the sonogram reading, the decedent was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and passed away from the disease 18 months after diagnosis at the age of 38.  The decedent left behind her husband and two children ages 3 and 6.   The plaintiff sought damages for pain and suffering and wrongful death including loss of guidance for the children and loss of earnings.  The Defendant argued that the sonogram showed no abnormalities of the pancreas at all and no further testing was required based upon the findings.  Both plaintiff and defendant called Board Certified expert witnesses in Radiology and Oncology and plaintiff also called an Economist to establish damages. In summation, plaintiff asked for a total of $10.9 million dollars in damages.  The jury deliberated for three and a half hours and returned a unanimous defense verdict.        

On December 19, 2024, Christian Fumuso obtained a unanimous defense verdict after a three week trial in Supreme Court, Suffolk County before the Honorable Alison Napolitano.  It was alleged by the Estate of the plaintiff’s decedent that the defendant Interventional Radiologist perforated the patients large bowel during the placement of a drainage catheter to relieve the contents of an abscess attached to the patients colon.  As a result of the alleged perforation, plaintiff’s Estate claimed that the decedent required an emergent colectomy after she developed peritonitis and sustained 5 years of pain and suffering related to chronic post-surgical fistula’s, infection, malnourishment and death.  Defendant’s argued that the bowel perforation was pre-existing and the result of complications from a prior surgical procedure which led to anastomotic breakdown causing the abscess development which had to be drained by the defendant.  In support of defendant’s theory, radiographic evidence was introduced showing the existence of a pre-existing communication between the large bowel and abscess cavity via fistulous tract near the anastomotic segment while the catheter remained away from the bowel lumen.       

Both plaintiff and defendant called Board Certified expert witnesses in Interventional Radiology and General Surgery.

In summation, plaintiff asked for $2.7 million dollars in damages related to 5 years of alleged pain and suffering up to the time of death.

The jury deliberated for a little over 1 hour and returned a unanimous defense verdict.